The Coventry Candle and the Cry of the Innocents
- Fr. Scott Haynes

- Dec 28, 2025
- 3 min read
Fr. Scott Haynes
A Meditation on Light, Lament, and Christmas Blood
The Coventry Candle burns in silence, but it stands beside one of the most sorrowful texts ever sung at Christmastime: Coventry Carol. To understand the candle fully, we must listen to the carol’s words, for they are not sung to the Child, but for the children who never lived to see Him grow.
The carol speaks in the voice of mothers.
“Lully, lullay, thou little tiny child…”
It sounds at first like a lullaby, gentle and tender. But quickly the tone darkens. This is not a song to soothe a baby to sleep. It is a song sung over empty cradles. The mothers rock their arms, but the children are gone.
The text recalls the slaughter ordered by Herod the Great, who, hearing of a newborn King, chose fear over faith. Unable to bear the thought of losing power, he unleashed violence upon the most defenseless. Bethlehem’s streets ran with innocent blood. The Church remembers these children as the Holy Innocents, martyrs who died not for what they believed, but for whom they resembled.
Here Christmas sheds its sentimental skin.
The birth of Christ immediately provokes resistance. The Light enters the world, and the darkness strikes back. The manger casts a shadow, and that shadow stretches all the way to Bethlehem’s graves. This is not an interruption of the Christmas story. It is part of it.
The Coventry Carol was composed in the sixteenth century for a mystery play, performed by townspeople who knew grief well. Plagues, wars, infant death, and political terror were not abstractions. When they sang of mothers weeping, they sang with memory. The carol does not explain the massacre. It does not justify God. It simply weeps.
And so does the Coventry Candle.
When Coventry Cathedral was destroyed in 1940, its ruins joined a long fellowship of broken sanctuaries. Fire fell from the sky. Children died. Mothers mourned. The modern world learned again what Bethlehem already knew: that violence always claims the innocent first.
In the shattered cathedral, the candle was lit not as a denial of grief, but as a refusal to let grief become hatred. Just as the Holy Innocents did not die in vain, so the victims of war are not forgotten. The candle burns where screams once echoed, saying quietly what the carol sings aloud: that sorrow must be remembered, not erased.
There is a chilling continuity here. Herod’s rage and modern warfare share the same logic. If fear rules the heart, innocence becomes expendable. Power always justifies itself. And children always pay the price.
Yet the Church dares to sing the Coventry Carol at Christmas.
Why?
Because the Child who escaped Herod’s sword would one day stretch out His hands and refuse to summon angels. Because the Innocents died for Christ before they ever knew His name. Because their blood, like Abel’s, cries out to heaven, and heaven answers not with revenge, but with redemption.
The Coventry Candle stands as a Christian reply to Herod. It says: you did not win. You never do. You can shatter stone and silence voices, but you cannot extinguish mercy. You can kill the body, but you cannot kill the meaning of sacrifice.
The mothers in the carol sing through tears, but they sing. That itself is an act of faith. Lament becomes prayer. Sorrow becomes offering. The lullaby becomes prophecy.
To contemplate the Coventry Candle is to accept a hard truth about Christmas. Christ did not come to a peaceful world. He came to a violent one. He did not wait until children were safe. He came because they were not.
And still He comes.
The candle’s flame is small. Deliberately so. It does not overpower the darkness. It endures within it. Like the Holy Innocents. Like Bethlehem. Like the Cross.
So we light the candle.
We sing the carol.
We remember the children.
And we dare to believe that the God who entered history through blood and tears will one day wipe every tear away, not by forgetting the Innocents, but by raising them into a Kingdom where no Herod can ever rule again.



Comments